The DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™
The DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™
A State-by-State Analysis of Dropout Risk, Chronic Absenteeism, and Teen Suicide, and What Educational Leaders Can Do About It
Download the Executive Brief | Download the Chart
Download the Complete White Paper
America’s schools are confronting a student wellness crisis that can no longer be understood through academic achievement alone. Educational leaders are increasingly responsible for responding to rising chronic absenteeism, student disengagement, mental health concerns, behavioral challenges, and uneven graduation outcomes. These issues are often reported separately, yet they are deeply connected and frequently reflect the same underlying conditions: weakened school connectedness, unmet student needs, inconsistent support systems, and organizational structures that identify concerns too late.
The DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™ was developed to help educational leaders see the larger picture. The Index converts three critical statewide indicators into standardized concern scores and then combines them into one weighted composite score:
Estimated Dropout Risk — 33.3%
The Estimated Dropout Risk is calculated by subtracting a state’s four-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate from 100 percent. This measure provides a consistent national proxy for the proportion of students who do not earn a regular high school diploma within four years.
Chronic Absenteeism — 33.3%
Chronic absenteeism represents the percentage of students who miss 10 percent or more of the school year for any reason. In a typical 180-day school year, this equals approximately eighteen missed days.
Teen Suicide Rate — 33.4%
The teen suicide rate reflects deaths by suicide per 100,000 young people ages 15–19. Its inclusion recognizes that student wellness must extend beyond attendance and academic completion to include emotional health, safety, hope, and survival.
Together, these three indicators answer three essential leadership questions:
· Are students staying in school?
· Are students attending school consistently?
· Are students emotionally healthy enough to live, learn, and thrive?
The resulting Student Wellness Crisis Index™ score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater overall concern. Forty-four states had complete data for all three indicators and received a composite Index score. Six states lacked one required indicator because the federal data were unavailable or officially suppressed and are designated Not Ranked (NR). No missing values were estimated or imputed. The Index is intended to help leaders compare statewide conditions, identify broad patterns, prioritize strategic attention, and initiate deeper local inquiry.
The Index is not designed to label states, districts, schools, or educators as successful or unsuccessful. It is a leadership tool. Its purpose is to make fragmented data more understandable and to help leaders move from isolated responses toward coherent systems of student support.
Why Graduation Rate Is Used to Support the Dropout Conversation
State-reported dropout rates are not always directly comparable. States may differ in how they classify transfers, alternative education placements, students pursuing equivalency credentials, students remaining enrolled beyond four years, and other enrollment outcomes.
he four-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate provides a more consistent national measure because states report it through a common federal framework. For that reason, DKEC estimates dropout risk using the following calculation:
Estimated Dropout Risk = 100% − Four-Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate
DKEC recognizes that not every student who fails to graduate within four years has permanently dropped out. Some students graduate in five or six years, continue receiving services, remain enrolled, or earn a certificate of completion. Therefore, the dropout-risk measure should be understood as an estimate of on-time noncompletion, not as an exact count of students who permanently leave school. Despite that limitation, the four-year graduation rate remains one of the strongest and most consistent indicators of whether educational systems are successfully supporting students through high school completion.
The Central Leadership Message
Student wellness is not a separate initiative. It is the outcome of leadership, culture, relationships, instructional quality, organizational design, and the strength of student support systems.
When these systems are coherent, students are more likely to attend, engage, persist, graduate, and seek help when they are struggling.
When these systems are fragmented, students are more likely to become disconnected long before their needs appear in a final accountability report.
What Educational Leaders Need to Know
The DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™ reveals that student wellness must be viewed as a connected system rather than as a collection of unrelated problems. Attendance, graduation, and mental health are not separate concerns competing for attention. They are interdependent indicators of whether students experience school as a place where they are known, supported, challenged, and valued.
Three Major Leadership Findings
1. Chronic Absenteeism Is One of the Earliest and Most Actionable Warning Signs
Graduation is a long-term outcome. Attendance is a daily indicator.
Students who become chronically absent often demonstrate academic difficulty, weakened school connection, increased behavioral concerns, and greater risk of noncompletion. Attendance data therefore provide leaders with one of the clearest opportunities to intervene before disengagement becomes permanent.
Attendance should not be treated simply as a matter of compliance. Persistent absence may reflect anxiety, depression, bullying, transportation barriers, housing instability, family responsibilities, health concerns, academic frustration, or a lack of belonging.
The leadership question is not simply, “Why is the student absent?” The more important question is, “What is the student’s absence telling us about the system, the student’s experience, or the barriers surrounding that student?”
2. Teen Suicide Represents the Most Severe Outcome of a Broader Wellness Crisis
Youth suicide is not solely a school issue, and schools cannot control every factor affecting adolescent mental health. Family circumstances, trauma, community conditions, social isolation, health care access, substance use, violence, and other forces all play a role.
However, schools remain one of the most influential environments in the lives of young people. Trusted adults, strong peer relationships, school connectedness, psychological safety, and accessible mental health supports can all serve as powerful protective factors.
The inclusion of teen suicide within the Index reflects a fundamental belief: educational success cannot be separated from student survival, dignity, belonging, and hope.
3. Student Wellness Is a Systems and Leadership Issue
Districts often respond to complex problems by adding isolated programs. An attendance initiative is launched. A new behavioral platform is purchased. A mental health curriculum is introduced. A graduation intervention is created.
These efforts may be valuable, but they are unlikely to produce lasting improvement unless they are connected through strong leadership and coherent systems.
Student wellness improves when leaders align expectations, people, data, interventions, communication, family engagement, and community partnerships around a shared purpose.
Programs may support the work. Leadership determines whether the work becomes embedded, sustained, and effective.
How Leaders Should Use the Index
The DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™ should be used to begin conversations, not end them.
District and school leaders can use the Index to:
place local data within a larger statewide and national context;
inform strategic planning and resource allocation;
examine the alignment of attendance, graduation, and wellness efforts;
strengthen Multi-Tiered Systems of Support;
identify student groups experiencing disproportionate challenges;
guide board, cabinet, and leadership team discussions;
determine where more detailed local analysis is required; and
monitor whether leadership actions are improving student experiences over time.
The Index should not be used to evaluate individual educators, assign blame, rank districts, or replace local evidence. Statewide conditions cannot capture every district’s context, strengths, or challenges.
The Index is most valuable when leaders pair it with local attendance data, graduation trends, student surveys, behavioral indicators, course performance, referral data, school climate measures, and student and family voice.
From Data to Leadership Action
The value of the DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™ is not found in the rankings alone. Its value lies in the action it inspires. Educational leaders cannot change statewide conditions immediately, but they can strengthen the systems students experience every day. The following three priorities provide a practical starting point for district and school leaders.
1. Build a Culture Where Every Student Belongs
Belonging is not an abstract idea. It is an organizational condition shaped by leadership. Students are more likely to attend, engage, persist, and seek help when they believe adults know them, respect them, and care about their future. Leaders should intentionally create systems that ensure every student has access to trusted adults, meaningful relationships, student voice, affirming experiences, and a clear sense of membership within the school community.
Districts should ask whether belonging is left to chance or built into schedules, advisory structures, mentoring, extracurricular opportunities, classroom practices, transitions, and student support systems.
2. Invest in Leadership Capacity
Student wellness efforts succeed or fail through leadership.
Principals shape school culture. District leaders align resources and expectations. Teachers influence daily connection and engagement. Support staff often notice concerns before anyone else. Cabinet members determine whether student wellness is integrated into strategy or treated as a separate initiative.
Leaders need the capacity to interpret data, manage change, build trust, create coherent systems, lead collaborative teams, respond to trauma, strengthen family partnerships, and sustain improvement over time. The quality of leadership determines whether good intentions become better outcomes.
3. Create a Continuous Improvement Cycle
Student wellness should be reviewed through an ongoing cycle of inquiry, action, monitoring, and refinement.
Leaders should regularly examine:
attendance and chronic absenteeism;
course failures and credit accumulation;
graduation and on-time completion;
behavior and discipline;
student and family perceptions;
school connectedness;
mental health referrals;
intervention access and effectiveness; and
patterns across student groups and schools.
The purpose of data review is not simply to report what happened. It is to understand why it happened, determine what can be influenced, and make informed adjustments.
The DKEC Perspective
At DK Education Collaborative, we believe better leadership creates better systems, better systems create better schools, and better schools create better futures for kids.
That belief is central to the DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™.
The Index was not created to criticize states or schools. It was created to help leaders confront complex realities with clarity, compassion, and resolve.
As emphasized in When All Means All, a commitment to every student requires more than inclusive language. It requires educational systems capable of recognizing needs early, responding effectively, removing barriers, strengthening relationships, and creating conditions in which every learner can thrive.
Student wellness cannot be delegated to one office, one professional role, or one initiative. It must be embedded within leadership, strategy, culture, instruction, operations, and continuous improvement.
A Call to Lead
Every percentage point represents students. Every absence represents lost connection and learning. Every student who does not graduate represents potential that may never be fully realized. Every life lost represents a family, school, and community permanently changed.
The DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™ gives educational leaders a clearer way to understand the challenge. What matters next is how leaders respond. The work begins with better questions, stronger systems, intentional relationships, and the courage to act before warning signs become irreversible outcomes.
That is the purpose of the Index. That is the responsibility of leadership.
That is the #DKECDifference.
Read the Complete White Paper
The full DKEC Student Wellness Crisis Index™ White Paper includes:
the complete state-by-state results for 44 ranked states and six states designated Not Ranked;
a detailed explanation of each indicator;
the Index calculation and weighting methodology;
limitations and appropriate uses of the Index;
an expanded research foundation;
detailed leadership strategies;
technical notes; and
a complete works cited section.